FAT Feedback


Home

Cesar


From: Cesar

To: breanne@camadro.com

Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:42 AM

Subject: in her shoes

Dear Breanne,

                       I just finished watching "In Her Shoes". You apparently have something against Hollywood. If you are, then you are definitely in the wrong profession. I do consider myself a good judge of movies and I assure you that this "chick-flick", as you call it, is an enjoyable motion picture. Both Cameron Diaz & Toni Collette are a perfect blend even more enhanced by the magnificent presence of a superb actress: Shirley MacLaine. Your sarcastic description of "old women thriving on the emotions of other people" gives me the impression that you cannot handle the fact that one day you will also be old....Cinema allows us to be what we are not. Cinema also allows us to dream, to cry and laugh without any barriers. By the way, you will be surprised to find out how much a dog-walker earn's...I'm afraif you haven't done your homework, Madam.

                                   Have a nice day

                                                            Cesar

 

Cesar,
        I am more than willing to defend my opinion that this film was lousy and that I never want to see it again.  If you would like to discuss this to great length, I would love to do so in the Fatcritics chat.  It's nice to have feedback from a reader, but I still think this movie sucks.
 
Cheers,
-Breanne

Alyssa


From: Alyssa

To: breanne@camadro.com

Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 5:52 AM

Subject: Hide and Seek conclusion

 

 

I recently saw the movie "hide and seek" but couldn't for the life of me
figure out why Dakota Fanning "emily" was in what seemd to be an insane
asylum at the conclusion. Could you please explain this to me?
thanx

Alyssa,

In regards to your question about "Hide and Seek" I would first like to
point out to you that in the theatrical ending Emily (Dakota Fanning) is not
in a mental institution.  However, in a couple of the alternate endings she
is in some sort of psych ward.  The filmmakers are implying that Emily
suffers the same disorder that caused her father to create "Charlie".  This
disorder is usually caused by a traumatic event in someone's life; in
Emily's case, it was probably the combination of her mother's death and her
disturbing experiences with "Charlie" that caused her to create an alternate
identity.  Her father's split-personality was caused by seeing his wife
cheating on him at the New Year's party.

Thank-you for your questions, I'm glad to be of help whenever I can.

Sincerely,

Breanne



Any questions or comments? Send them to breanne@camadro.com

Talk about the movies here: